While I appreciate the lighthearted approach you took toward the whole Sunderland sailing situation, I believe you missed the larger issue brought forth by those who criticized (T.O. Acorn June 24 editorial, “The global sailing trip was a family decision”).

I agree that it’s none of anyone’s business–until we end up paying for the rescues.

Not in this particular case, of course, as the Australian government paid the costs, but most of the criticism stems from the increasing number of daredevils taking chances in the wild who end up needing to be rescued by somebody’s tax dollars.

Glorifying–or maybe I should say “giving positive publicity to”–unreasonable risktaking encourages others to brainstorm ways they might push the limit in their own hobbies and, hey, maybe even gain some fame.

There are jurisdictions in the U.S. that make people pay for their own rescues.

If this were the law everywhere, then I would agree that it’s none of our business what risks people take, presuming they’re risking no one else’s health and well-being.

The criticism is more from communal concern than individual decision-making choices.
Colin Odell
Westlake Village